Protected Activity
One of the first questions we hear from potential whistleblowers concerned about retaliation is: “What exactly counts as protected activity?” Understanding this term is crucial for anyone considering pursuing a whistleblower action.
Protected activity refers to actions taken by an employee to expose, oppose, or report illegal or unethical conduct—particularly fraud against the government. Under the False Claims Act (FCA) and other similar statutes, employees may not lawfully be fired, demoted, or harassed by their employer as a result of engaging in protected activity.
Protected activity under the FCA doesn’t just mean filing a lawsuit. It can include reporting fraud internally, cooperating with government investigators, or even raising concerns about compliance violations. Courts have interpreted this concept broadly to ensure that employees who try to do the right thing are not punished for it. Other whistleblower statutes have their own definitions of protected activity.
In the healthcare setting, examples might include a nurse questioning improper Medicare billing, a billing manager flagging suspicious claims, or a physician refusing to accept illegal kickbacks.
At Barrett Johnston, we emphasize that recognizing protected activity helps employees act confidently and lawfully. It’s one of the strongest deterrents to retaliation—and one of the reasons whistleblower law works.
Protected activity under the False Claims Act is any lawful act taken by an employee to stop or expose fraud against the government.
The law is designed to encourage insiders to come forward without fear of employer retaliation, and as a result the courts interpret the concept broadly to shield employees who make good faith efforts to report misconduct. The protection applies regardless of whether a formal lawsuit ever gets filed.
What matters is that the employee acted on a reasonable belief that fraud was occurring and the employee does not need to be correct about the fraud, only reasonable. This broad protection reflects Congress’s intent to empower ordinary workers to safeguard taxpayer dollars.
No, filing a whistleblower lawsuit is just one form of protected activity.
The False Claims Act casts a much wider net. The law protects employees who take any step to expose or stop fraud against the government, whether that means reporting internally, refusing to participate in illegal conduct, or cooperating with investigators. Lawmakers designed the statute to encourage early intervention, not just formal litigation.
The protection begins the moment an employee acts on a reasonable belief that fraud is occurring because the law recognizes that whistleblowers often face retaliation long before a lawsuit is ever filed. It acknowledges that there is value in the act of coming forward, not the procedural vehicle used to do so.
Protected activity under the False Claims Act covers the following actions taken by employees to expose or stop fraud against the government:
-Filing a qui tam lawsuit on behalf of the government
-Internally reporting concerns to supervisors, compliance officers, or internal audit
-Cooperating with or assisting in a government investigation
-Testifying in any proceeding related to a False Claims Act case
-Refusing to participate in conduct that would violate the FCA
-Investigating possible fraud on their own
The activity does not need to result in a lawsuit. Protection starts the moment an employee takes any of these steps. However, the employee must have a reasonable belief that fraud occurred, even if they turn out to be wrong.
Yes, absolutely. Reporting fraud internally to a supervisor or compliance officer counts as protected activity under the False Claims Act.
The law does not require an employee to go straight to the government or file a lawsuit.
Lawmakers understood that many whistleblowers first try to fix problems from within. so the protection begins the moment an employee raises a good faith concern, even if the employer ignores it or denies any wrongdoing. This matters because retaliation often happens immediately after an internal report, long before any lawsuit is filed. The employee does not need to be proven right about the fraud, a reasonable belief is enough.
This way, law encourages employees to speak up early.
These are your protections if you engage in protected activity under the False Claims Act:
– Your employer cannot fire you, demote you, suspend you, or threaten you
– Your employer cannot harass you, reduce your pay, or blacklist you
– You can sue your employer directly in court without any administrative steps first
– If you win, you can get your job back, double your lost wages, plus interest
– You can also recover compensation for emotional distress and attorneys’ fees
– There is no cap on the damages you can receive
The law is designed to make whistleblowers whole and discourage employers from retaliating. These protections also apply to current employees, former employees, contractors, and agents.
A whistleblower enforces their retaliation protections by taking action directly in federal court. The False Claims Act does not require filing an administrative complaint first. If an employer fires, demotes, or harasses the whistleblower after protected activity, they can file a retaliation lawsuit alongside their qui tam case.
The whistleblower should document everything, including dates, emails, and witness statements.
Legal counsel can help file the claim and seek remedies like reinstatement and double back pay. The lawsuit must show that the employer knew about the protected activity and took adverse action because of it. Timing matters, so consulting an attorney early is essential.
These are some practical steps a whistleblower can take to document and preserve evidence of protected activity and any retaliation:
– Keep copies of all emails, memos, or reports that show you raised concerns about fraud
– Save performance reviews, pay stubs, and job descriptions to establish your work history
– Document dates, times, and details of any conversations with supervisors about fraud
– Note any changes in job duties, hours, or treatment after you reported concerns
– Preserve text messages, voicemails, or meeting notes that show employer hostility
– Ask trusted colleagues to keep records of what they witnessed
– Send yourself summaries of key events to a personal email account
Good documentation strengthens a retaliation claim. It helps prove causation and makes it harder for employers to invent innocent explanations.
