Author name: Super Web Pros

Don’t Forget the States—The Important But Complex Landscape of State-Level FCA Enforcement

When whistleblowers look to file suit for fraud against the government, the oldest and most common tool is the federal False Claims Act (FCA). This statute allows whistleblowers to file suit in the name of the United States and gives the Department of Justice (DOJ) an opportunity to investigate—sometimes for years at a time—while the case remains under seal and before the defendant is aware that the case has been filed. While the federal FCA is a powerful tool in fighting fraud and recovering taxpayer funds, one meaningful limitation is that it only applies to federal funds. The FCA cannot be used to recover funds for state or local government programs, or from private parties.

Don’t Forget the States—The Important But Complex Landscape of State-Level FCA Enforcement Read More »

US dollars and medication

One of the largest FCA judgments in history handed down against Janssen Products

On March 31, 2025, a federal court in New Jersey entered a $1.64 billion False Claims Act judgment against Janssen Products, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. The whistleblowers—two sales representatives who had worked for the company—alleged that Janssen had illegally marketed two HIV medications (Prezista and Intelence) off-label.

One of the largest FCA judgments in history handed down against Janssen Products Read More »

Man writing on a clipboard.

Supreme Court Refuses to Restrict the Definition of “Claim” Under the False Claims Act: Insights From Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S. ex Rel. Heath

How is a “claim” defined under the False Claims Act (FCA)? The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. Heath has shed new light on a critical aspect of the False Claims Act (FCA)—what exactly constitutes a “claim.”

Supreme Court Refuses to Restrict the Definition of “Claim” Under the False Claims Act: Insights From Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S. ex Rel. Heath Read More »

Too Good to Pass Up — Why Certain Industries Seem More Prone to Repeated Fraud

Any time the United States is paying for a particular item or service, chances are high that someone is devising ways to game the system and violate the False Claims Act (FCA). Certain industries and specialties are more prone to fraud and abuse than others. Our law firm, Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison, PLLC, stays on top of the latest developments involving health care fraud and False Claims Act cases to represent whistleblowers in cases all over the country.

Too Good to Pass Up — Why Certain Industries Seem More Prone to Repeated Fraud Read More »

A whistle next to a judge gavel.

DOJ Looking for More Whistleblower Help to Fight Financial Fraud

The Federal False Claims Act (FCA) is the oldest and arguably most developed whistleblower program in the United States. Building off the success of that law, Congress has enacted a number of other targeted whistleblower programs over the years to deal with specific industries and particular types of fraud. Examples include the SEC, IRS, and CFTC whistleblower programs, as well as a host of state-level statutes modeled off of the federal FCA.

DOJ Looking for More Whistleblower Help to Fight Financial Fraud Read More »

A woman with gloves on looking at reports with a magnifying glass.

Does Intent Matter in Health Care False Claims Cases?

Can one be found guilty of committing health care fraud if they didn’t intend to do so? The landscape of proving intent in kickback-based false claims act cases is murky and developing. As national leaders in health care fraud enforcement, our law firm, Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison, PLLC, stays on top of the latest developments involving health care fraud and False Claims Act cases to represent whistleblowers in cases all over the country.

Does Intent Matter in Health Care False Claims Cases? Read More »

Former Owners of  a federal Health Clinic Pay $800,000 to the State of Tennessee Resolve Claims of Billing for more Medicaid Visits than Performed.

Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison represented the former Chief Operating Officer in blowing the whistle on what was, at the time, the only Federally Qualified Health Clinic Look-Alike in the State of Tennessee. Under this FQHC look-alike program, qualifying clinics may take advantage of certain favorable billing rules in exchange for an agreement not to turn

Former Owners of  a federal Health Clinic Pay $800,000 to the State of Tennessee Resolve Claims of Billing for more Medicaid Visits than Performed. Read More »

Dialysis company pays $3,246,000 to resolve claims of paying kickbacks to Memphis-area nephrologists.

A dialysis joint venture, Wellbound of Memphis, LLC, paid $3,246,000 to the United States to resolve allegations that partners in the joint venture made illegal payments to several Memphis-area nephrologists in exchange for patient referrals, a practice that violates the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and federal False Claims Act. These alleged inducements included selling ownership interests

Dialysis company pays $3,246,000 to resolve claims of paying kickbacks to Memphis-area nephrologists. Read More »

Nursing Home Operator pays more than $30 million to resolve allegations of manipulating patient therapy schedules to increase profitability.

We represented an occupational therapist and certified occupational therapy assistant who alleged that their employer, a large regional nursing home chain, defrauded the United States by manipulating patient therapy schedules to increase reimbursement for the company, without regard for what was in the best interests of their patients.   At the time, Medicare reimbursed skilled nursing

Nursing Home Operator pays more than $30 million to resolve allegations of manipulating patient therapy schedules to increase profitability. Read More »

$160 Million FCA recovery against diabetic testing supply giant for engaging in a kickback scheme.

Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison represented a call center working who alleged that his employer, Arriva Medical, was engaging in a scheme to waive patient co-pays on diabetic testing supplies to induce their business.  For many types of Medicare-covered items and services, the United States requires the beneficiary to pay some portion of the cost

$160 Million FCA recovery against diabetic testing supply giant for engaging in a kickback scheme. Read More »